Author |
Topic  |
|
Elsid

3 Posts |
Posted - 02/16/2010 : 21:28:59
|
When will the TTL/CMOS testing function be added to the software? If the answer is not for a long time, is it possible to give an example of how it may be implemented in the devices.txt file? Or is it more complex than this? Thanks |
|
Reply #1
ZLM
    
2947 Posts |
Posted - 02/17/2010 : 13:48:11
|
The current hardware need a adapter for this task. Not just software. |
 |
|
Reply #2
Elsid

3 Posts |
Posted - 02/17/2010 : 13:52:39
|
OK. When will the adapter and new software be available?
|
 |
|
Reply #3
ZLM
    
2947 Posts |
Posted - 02/17/2010 : 22:22:46
|
Not decide yet. No time frame for that feature on GQ-4X. |
 |
|
Reply #4
ZLM
    
2947 Posts |
Posted - 02/17/2010 : 22:22:46
|
Not decide yet. No time frame for that feature on GQ-4X. |
 |
|
Reply #5
Elsid

3 Posts |
Posted - 02/18/2010 : 03:05:07
|
Given that situation,what would you recommed for TTL/CMOS testing? I was thinking of one of the Wellon units. |
 |
|
Reply #6
ZLM
    
2947 Posts |
Posted - 02/18/2010 : 07:53:32
|
If you only need to do the TTL/CMOS testing. Then the VP280 will be fine. If you need to do other programming job, then you can looked other model. It depends on your main task. |
 |
|
Reply #7
supervizeur
    
462 Posts |
Posted - 11/17/2015 : 07:32:02
|
TTL/CMOS testing/identification would be nice to have on the GQ4X |
 |
|
Reply #8
anniel
    
2596 Posts |
Posted - 04/06/2016 : 16:13:32
|
I support this! |
 |
|
Reply #9
supervizeur
    
462 Posts |
Posted - 10/19/2016 : 04:22:22
|
Any time frame? |
 |
|
Reply #10
anniel
    
2596 Posts |
Posted - 02/28/2017 : 04:33:44
|
"The current hardware need a adapter for this task."
Would it be easier to implement on the GQ-4X V4 |
 |
|
Reply #11
supervizeur
    
462 Posts |
Posted - 05/06/2017 : 04:49:24
|
Hi ZLM, any update on TTL, CMOS and RAM testing on GQ4X or GQ-4X V4? |
 |
|
Reply #12
anniel
    
2596 Posts |
Posted - 05/07/2017 : 10:09:46
|
Any news? |
 |
|
Reply #13
supervizeur
    
462 Posts |
Posted - 05/29/2017 : 06:39:39
|
How long has this been on the back burner? |
 |
|
Reply #14
anniel
    
2596 Posts |
Posted - 05/29/2017 : 10:01:17
|
quote: Originally posted by supervizeur
How long has this been on the back burner?
Something else we'll never know. |
 |
|
Reply #15
supervizeur
    
462 Posts |
Posted - 05/30/2017 : 06:53:32
|
A separate forum section should be devoted to new developments and recent devices additions. |
 |
|
Reply #16
anniel
    
2596 Posts |
Posted - 05/30/2017 : 14:35:01
|
quote: Originally posted by supervizeur
A separate forum section should be devoted to new developments and recent devices additions.
+1 |
 |
|
Reply #17
anniel
    
2596 Posts |
Posted - 02/16/2018 : 07:38:09
|
Any news on this? |
 |
|
|
Topic  |
|